top of page
Image by Jack Anstey

Frequently Asked Questions

Real answers to the questions that keep people up at night — grounded in scripture, free from religion.

What About Hell: Is It Real?

This question deserves honest engagement, not dismissal. But the picture most people carry didn't actually come from careful reading of Scripture.

​

back to all questions

The short answer

The question is real and it matters. But before answering it, something needs to be acknowledged honestly: most of what people picture when they hear the word hell did not come directly from the biblical text. It developed over centuries through the influence of Greek philosophy, Roman legal thinking, medieval theology, and Dante's *Inferno* in 1320. Those inherited images then became the lens through which people read Scripture, rather than letting Scripture form the picture.

​

That is not a small observation, and it is not meant to sidestep the question. It is the necessary starting point for reading the biblical material carefully. Because when you go back to the actual words of Scripture and let them define their own terms, what you find is significantly different from the picture most people inherited. And the gospel sounds like considerably better news than most people have been told.

Five different words,
one English translation

The most important thing to know about the word "hell" in your English Bible is that it is translating five completely different words from different languages, different time periods, and different contexts. Those five words do not mean the same thing. Collapsing them into a single image produces a picture the biblical text itself does not support.

​

Sheol is the Hebrew word used throughout the entire Old Testament. It means the grave, the realm of the dead, the place of the departed. Both righteous and unrighteous people are described as going to Sheol. It is death language, not torment language. The Old Testament is consistent on this: Sheol is where the dead go.

​

Hades is the Greek equivalent of Sheol in the New Testament: the realm of the dead. The detail that matters most about Hades is what Revelation 20:14 says happens to it: death and Hades are thrown into the lake of fire. If Hades itself gets thrown into something else, Hades cannot be the final destination. It is part of the story of death being defeated, not the end of the story.

​

Gehenna is the word Jesus used most often and the one most frequently mistranslated as hell. Gehenna is a real geographical place: the Valley of Hinnom outside Jerusalem, a site with a dark history of child sacrifice that had become the city's rubbish dump by Jesus's day. When Jesus used Gehenna, he was using specific covenant warning language his Jewish listeners would have understood immediately. He was drawing on a powerful prophetic symbol rooted in a real place to warn about the consequences of rejecting the kingdom and the leadership of those taking people away from the Father. These are not descriptions of a torture chamber. They are urgent covenant warnings using the most powerful symbolic language available to a first century Jewish rabbi.

​

Tartarus appears exactly once in the New Testament, in 2 Peter 2:4, and refers to rebellious spiritual beings rather than human beings. It is judgment language aimed at spiritual powers, not a description of where people go when they die.

​

The Abyss is consistently used in Revelation and parts of the Gospels as containment language about demonic powers, not human beings.

Five words. Five different meanings. When someone says the Bible clearly teaches hell, the right question is: which word, which passage, which audience, which context.

The word that changes everything:
aionios and kolasis

The passage most often cited in conversations about eternal punishment is Matthew 25:46: "Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life." Most people read that as a straightforward contrast: endless torment on one side, endless bliss on the other. But the actual Greek words Jesus used tell a more precise and more significant story.

​

The word translated "eternal" is aionios. It comes from aion, which means age. Aionios carries the sense of belonging to the age to come, having the quality of the coming age. It is not primarily a mathematical statement about duration without end. It is a qualitative statement about the nature and character of something belonging to God's age. Jesus himself defines aionios life in John 17:3: "This is eternal life, that they know you the only true God and Jesus Christ whom you have sent." Aionios life is knowing the Father. Relational. Not just a measurement of time.

​

The word translated "punishment" is kolasis. And this word matters enormously. The ancient world distinguished carefully between two kinds of punishment: kolasis, which is corrective discipline aimed at the betterment of the one receiving it, and timoria, which is retributive punishment for its own sake. Plato made this distinction explicitly. Kolasis has a purpose. It accomplishes something. It is aimed at restoration.

​

So aionios kolasis, the phrase Jesus actually used, is age-completing corrective discipline. Real, serious, consequential. But purposeful and corrective, aimed at what God's fire has always been aimed at throughout Scripture: burning away what is false so that what is real can remain. That is a more precise reading than the traditional framework offers, and it is consistent with everything else Scripture says about the nature of God's fire and the character of the Father.

What fire actually means in Scripture

Fire is the dominant image people associate with hell. But before reaching for the medieval picture of flames and torment, it is worth asking what fire consistently represents throughout Scripture from beginning to end.

​

The answer is remarkably consistent. Fire is how God shows up.

​

Moses meets God in a burning bush that is not consumed. The very first appearance of God to Moses is fire that burns without destroying: not fire as threat, but fire as holy nearness. God leads Israel through the wilderness by a pillar of fire, not to threaten but to guide and protect. At Sinai the mountain burns when God descends, and his first words from that fire are the declaration of covenant love and liberation. At Pentecost, tongues of fire rest on the disciples: the coming of the Holy Spirit described as fire, not threat but empowerment and transformation.

​

That is the consistent picture. Fire is God's presence, drawing near to humanity, not moving against it.

​

Beyond presence, fire in Scripture represents purification. Malachi 3:2-3 describes God as a refiner's fire, sitting as a refiner and purifier, with the goal being restoration, not torment. And 1 Corinthians 3:12-15 gives us what may be the most important passage for this whole conversation. Paul describes a person whose works are burned while the person themselves is saved, "yet so as through fire." Saved through fire. Not despite the fire, not barely escaping it, but through it. Paul gives us a biblical category for fire that burns away what is false without destroying the person. The fire tests the work, not the person. What cannot survive is what was always false. What remains is what was always real.

​

When Jesus uses the phrase "unquenchable fire," most people read that as fire that never ends. But that is not what the phrase means in biblical usage. Jeremiah 17:27 says Jerusalem will be burned with unquenchable fire. Jerusalem is not still burning today. Unquenchable means a fire that cannot be stopped before it finishes its purpose: inevitable completion, not infinite duration. Which connects directly to *aionios*: age-completing, finishing its purpose.

​

Hebrews 12:29 says our God is a consuming fire. Read in context, the author has just described the joyful assembly and the city of the living God that believers have come into. And in that context: our God is a consuming fire. If God is love, as 1 John 4:8 declares, and our God is a consuming fire, as Hebrews 12:29 declares, then the consuming fire is what love looks like in its most complete expression: not God becoming something other than love, but love itself burning away fear, shame, false identity, everything that keeps people from who they were made to be.

​

Here is the central insight: fire does not change. The posture toward it does. When you are aligned with truth, fire is warmth and light and presence. When you are clinging to what is false, fire feels threatening. But it is the same fire. The same presence. The same love. Experienced differently depending on what you bring to it.

What Revelation actually says

Most teaching on hell stops at the lake of fire in Revelation 20 and treats that as the final word. But Revelation keeps going. And what comes after the lake of fire is the most important part of the whole book.

​

The lake of fire in Revelation is not introduced with human beings. It is introduced with the beast and the false prophet in chapter 19, then the devil in chapter 20. And then the most significant detail: death and Hades themselves are thrown into the lake of fire in Revelation 20:14. Death gets thrown in. The lake of fire is the place where death ends, not where it continues forever. 1 Corinthians 15:26 says the last enemy to be destroyed is death. Revelation and Paul are completely aligned: God's endgame is destroying death, not preserving it in a torture chamber.

​

Then Revelation continues. Chapter 21 describes the nations walking by the light of the New Jerusalem, kings of the earth bringing their glory into it. Chapter 22 brings back the imagery of Eden: a river of life from the throne, the tree of life, and its leaves for the healing of the nations. Healing, after the lake of fire. Not torment. The healing of the nations as the fruit of everything God's fire accomplished.

​

Revelation 21:25 says the gates of the city shall not be shut at all by day, and there will be no night there. In the ancient world, city gates were shut at night for protection from threats in the darkness. But this city has no night and no threat. So the gates remain permanently open. Open gates mean access remains. The story does not end in permanent exclusion.

​

And Revelation ends with an invitation: "The Spirit and the bride say, come. And let the one who hears say, come. Let the one who is thirsty come. Let whoever desires take the water of life freely." The final posture of the entire canon of Scripture is an open invitation. Not a God trying to keep people out. A Father bringing his children home.

​

Acts 3:21 says Jesus remains in heaven until the restoration of all things. 1 Corinthians 15:22-28 says God will ultimately be all in all. The governing trajectory of Scripture is not partial rescue alongside endless punishment. It is God's purposes accomplished, death destroyed, and restoration as the final word.

The Father that Jesus revealed

Jesus said in John 14:9 that if you have seen him, you have seen the Father. Not a rough approximation of the Father. The Father himself, fully revealed.

​

So look at Jesus. He healed everyone who came to him. He turned nobody away. He ran toward the broken, the outcast, the sinful, the desperate. He forgave from the cross the very people who put him there. He wept at the tomb of his friend. He was moved with compassion when he saw the crowds.

​

That is the Father.

And then ask honestly whether the traditional picture of hell is consistent with that Father. A God who creates human beings knowing the vast majority will end up in endless conscious torment with no purpose and no end. A God whose response to the failure of his own creation is to preserve that failure in conscious suffering for eternity. A God whose love is real but somehow compatible with the endless agony of billions.

​

1 John 4:8 does not say God is loving. It says God is love. And 1 John 4:18 says perfect love casts out fear because fear has to do with punishment. That verse is not just a comfort. It is a diagnostic. Any theology that keeps producing chronic fear of God in people who genuinely love him has not yet fully encountered what love actually is.

​

The traditional picture of hell is not just a theological position that happens to be mistaken. It is the single biggest character assassination of the Father in the history of Christianity. Not because the people who taught it were malicious: most of them loved God genuinely. But the picture they inherited and passed on produced exactly what Scripture says the gospel should cast out. Fear.

What about free will and universalism?

This is where the question gets asked directly, and it deserves a direct answer.

​

The teaching here is not universalism. Universalism says everyone ends up saved regardless of their choices, which removes the significance of free will and the reality of what we do with our lives. That is not the position.

​

Free will is real. Choice matters. And the Bible does describe two different outcomes in Matthew 25:46. But as we have seen, those two outcomes are *aionios zoe*, the life of knowing the Father, and *aionios kolasis*, age-completing corrective discipline. Two experiences of the same age. Two encounters with the same God.

​

Those who came to Christ in this life have been refined with him gradually, brought into the knowledge of the Father as love and safety, and they step into the age to come already knowing whose they are. That is the inheritance of the kingdom.

​

Those who did not come to Christ step into that same encounter with the presence of God without that context. They encounter the same fire, the same love, the same truth. But without having known the Father as safe, they experience it as judgment and exposure rather than warmth and welcome. The fire does not change. What they bring to it does.

​

This is why the picture is two different experiences of the same reality, not two completely different destinations. God's presence is what everyone encounters. The quality of that encounter is shaped by what was built in this life and what was known of the Father.

​

The restoration of all things is not a hopeful possibility held loosely. It is the declared trajectory of the finished work. Acts 3:21 says Jesus remains in heaven until the restoration of all things, not the restoration of some things. The age of refining has an end because its purpose is restoration, and restoration is a finishing process, not an endless one. This is what makes the intensity of "weeping and gnashing of teeth" make sense: if those outside Christ encounter the full weight of purifying love all at once rather than gradually across a lifetime, that concentrated exposure would be overwhelming in a way that gradual refinement is not. The intensity of the language fits the intensity of the moment. But the end of the process is the same end the whole of Scripture is moving toward. God does not lose. Restoration is the final word, not as sentiment, but as the sure completion of what the cross accomplished.

The bottom line

Hell is real. Judgment is real. Consequence is serious and weighty. Scripture never minimises any of that.

​

But the medieval picture of endless conscious torment with no purpose and no end cannot be sustained from the biblical text once you let the text define its own terms. The five words translated "hell" mean five different things. Aionios is age-quality, not infinite duration. Kolasis is corrective discipline, not retributive punishment. Fire throughout Scripture is God's purifying presence, not sadism. And Revelation ends not with locked gates and endless suffering but with open gates, healing nations, and an invitation still being spoken.

​

The governing reality of the whole story is this: God does not lose. The fire accomplishes what it was always set out to accomplish. And the final word of the canon is not condemnation. It is come. Drink freely. Whoever desires.

​

That is the Father Jesus came to reveal. And it is better news than most of us have ever been told.

"Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here! All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting people's sins against them. And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation."

2 Corinthians 5:17-19

bottom of page